SYNTHETIC / DEMO — 合成データによる見本です。実在の顧客ではありません。 This is a sample built from synthetic data; it is not a customer engagement.

Supplier / Solution Scouting Brief — SAMPLE (synthetic data)

Supplier / Solution Scouting

Report · レポートSupplier / Solution Scouting Brief — SAMPLE (synthetic data)
Product · 製品サプライヤー / ソリューション探索 / Supplier / Solution Scouting
Prepared for · 宛先Sample organization (SYNTHETIC SAMPLE)
Version · 版v1 · compiled 2026-09-01 · released 2026-09-01
Reference · 参照MM-WD-SAMPLE0000000000 · SUPPLIER_SOLUTION_SCOUTING_BRIEF · mm-ddv1-deliverable-compiler/1.0.0
Review · 確認compiled not reviewed · state released
Evidence basis · 根拠4 passages · 4 sources · stale · latest 2026-05-02 · contradictions none
Classification · 区分customer private tenant · SYNTHETIC
Caseサンプル市：路線減便後の高齢者の移動アクセス（合成データ） (founder review, v1)
Decision this document serves · この文書が支える意思決定
来年度にデマンド交通の実証事業を行うかどうかを決めたい（合成データ）

この成果物が扱う判断 The decision this addresses

何を決めようとしているか · What decision is being made?

  1. 事実 · fact 来年度にデマンド交通の実証事業を行うかどうかを決めたい（合成データ） (the requester's own words)
  2. 事実 · fact Geography stated by the requester: Sample City (synthetic) (customer-provided)
  3. 事実 · fact User group stated by the requester: 75歳以上の住民 (customer-provided)
  4. 事実 · fact Intended use stated by the requester: 議会向け予算説明 (customer-provided)

ニーズと Case Need and Case

どのニーズ・Case に対する探索か · What need / Case is this scouting for?

  1. 事実 · fact Case SAMPLE-CASE-01 — サンプル市：路線減便後の高齢者の移動アクセス（合成データ） (state FOUNDER_REVIEW, version 1)
    evidence SAMPLE-E01, SAMPLE-E02, SAMPLE-E03, SAMPLE-E04 · https://example.invalid/sample/service_change · https://example.invalid/sample/population · https://example.invalid/sample/satisfaction · https://example.invalid/sample/budget · observed 2026-05-02
  2. 推論 · inference 公開計画は運転手不足と減便を明記し、60歳以上の約4割が便数に不満と記載している（合成データ）。 (the Case thesis is an inference over the evidence, not a fact)
    evidence SAMPLE-E01, SAMPLE-E02, SAMPLE-E03, SAMPLE-E04 · https://example.invalid/sample/service_change · https://example.invalid/sample/population · https://example.invalid/sample/satisfaction · https://example.invalid/sample/budget · observed 2026-05-02
  3. 推論 · inference 減便後も高齢者が週2回の通院移動を維持できること — for 75歳以上の住民（合成データ） (SOURCE_CLAIM · OPEN)
    evidence SAMPLE-E01, SAMPLE-E03

制約 Constraints

どの制約が効くか · Which constraints matter?

  1. 事実 · fact 運行1日あたり上限コスト <= 48000 JPY (recorded on the Case)
  2. 事実 · fact 車椅子対応 = required (recorded on the Case)

候補ソリューションの種類 Candidate solution classes

どの種類が候補になるか · Which solution classes are candidates?

  1. 推論 · inference SOLUTION_CLASS demand-responsive-transport — INCLUDED (confidence 0.62)
    evidence SAMPLE-E01, SAMPLE-E03
  2. 仮説 · hypothesis SOLUTION_CLASS volunteer-transport — REQUIRES_VALIDATION (confidence 0.35) (requires validation before it can be relied on)
    evidence SAMPLE-E02
  3. 推論 · inference SUPPLIER SAMPLE-SUP-A — INCLUDED (confidence 0.58)
    evidence SAMPLE-E01
  4. 仮説 · hypothesis SUPPLIER SAMPLE-SUP-B — REQUIRES_VALIDATION (confidence 0.41) (requires validation before it can be relied on)
    evidence SAMPLE-E02

候補サプライヤー・製品 Candidate suppliers and products

どの候補が、どの根拠クラスで、なぜ挙がるか · Which candidates appear, on what evidence class, and why?

  1. 推論 · inference Demand-responsive transport (solution class) — INCLUDED (confidence 0.62) · not known: operator (evidence class: SYSTEM_EXTRACTED · appears because it was evaluated against this Case's recorded constraints — presence is not endorsement)
    evidence SAMPLE-E01, SAMPLE-E03
  2. 仮説 · hypothesis Volunteer transport (solution class) — REQUIRES_VALIDATION (confidence 0.35) · incompatibilities: insurance · not known: insurance, driver pool (evidence class: SYSTEM_EXTRACTED · appears because it was evaluated against this Case's recorded constraints — presence is not endorsement)
    evidence SAMPLE-E02
  3. 推論 · inference Sample Mobility Works Co. (SYNTHETIC SAMPLE) (JP) — INCLUDED (confidence 0.58) · not known: service network (evidence class: SUPPLIER_SELF_REPORTED · appears because it was evaluated against this Case's recorded constraints — presence is not endorsement)
    evidence SAMPLE-E01
  4. 仮説 · hypothesis Sample Assistive Devices GmbH (SYNTHETIC SAMPLE) (DE) — REQUIRES_VALIDATION (confidence 0.41) · incompatibilities: daily_cost_cap · not known: JP distributor, TAIS status (evidence class: INDEPENDENTLY_VERIFIED · appears because it was evaluated against this Case's recorded constraints — presence is not endorsement)
    evidence SAMPLE-E02

矛盾の開示 Conflict disclosure

どこで情報源が食い違うか · Where do sources conflict?

  1. 事実 · fact service change: "2026年4月に市内2路線が減便された（合成データ）" (1 passage · OFFICIAL)
    evidence SAMPLE-E01 · https://example.invalid/sample/service_change · observed 2026-05-01
  2. 事実 · fact population: "75歳以上の住民は約1,200人（合成データ）" (1 passage · OFFICIAL)
    evidence SAMPLE-E02 · https://example.invalid/sample/population · observed 2026-05-02
  3. 事実 · fact satisfaction: "60歳以上の約4割が便数に不満と回答（合成データ）" (1 passage · OFFICIAL)
    evidence SAMPLE-E03 · https://example.invalid/sample/satisfaction · observed 2026-04-20
  4. 事実 · fact budget: "地域公共交通関連予算は前年度比横ばい（合成データ）" (1 passage · OFFICIAL)
    evidence SAMPLE-E04 · https://example.invalid/sample/budget · observed 2026-03-30

分かっていないこと Unknowns

何が不完全か · What evidence is incomplete?

  1. 不明 · unknown Missing evidence class: FUNDING_PATHWAY (named by the qualification engine)
  2. 不明 · unknown Missing evidence class: OPERATOR_CAPACITY (named by the qualification engine)
  3. 推奨 · recommendation Bounded research task FUNDING_PATHWAY: sample city DRT subsidy programme (OPEN) (public-source only; nobody is contacted)

次に検証すべきこと Next validation

次に何を検証すべきか · What should be validated next?

  1. 不明 · unknown Missing evidence class: FUNDING_PATHWAY (named by the qualification engine)
  2. 不明 · unknown Missing evidence class: OPERATOR_CAPACITY (named by the qualification engine)
  3. 推奨 · recommendation Bounded research task FUNDING_PATHWAY: sample city DRT subsidy programme (OPEN) (public-source only; nobody is contacted)

次の安全な一手 Next safe action

外部行動なしに進められる次の一手は何か · What is the next action that commits nothing externally?

INCOMPLETE — this section is written by the reviewer before release; the compiler does not invent recommendations

Limitations · 制約:

This document does not claim · 主張しないこと:

Methodology: Public-source discovery → evidence extraction with provenance → candidate qualification → Case formation → match evaluation against recorded constraints → human review. Every statement carries FACT / INFERENCE / HYPOTHESIS / RECOMMENDATION / UNKNOWN and its evidence ids; sections the substrate cannot support are marked INCOMPLETE, never filled.

Distribution: prepared for the named organization; internal use; no redistribution; unverified items are marked · License: 社内利用限定・再配布不可・未検証事項明示 / internal use, no redistribution, unverified items marked

Mirai Move · MM-WD-SAMPLE0000000000 v1 · mm-pcpc1-report-render/1.0.0