Supplier / Solution Scouting Brief — sample (synthetic data)

この成果物が扱う判断 The decision this addresses

何を決めようとしているか · What decision is being made?

1. 事実 · fact来年度にデマンド交通の実証事業を行うかどうかを決めたい（合成データ）(the requester's own words)
2. 事実 · factGeography stated by the requester: Sample City (synthetic)(customer-provided)
3. 事実 · factUser group stated by the requester: 75歳以上の住民(customer-provided)
4. 事実 · factIntended use stated by the requester: 議会向け予算説明(customer-provided)

ニーズと Case Need and Case

どのニーズ・Case に対する探索か · What need / Case is this scouting for?

1. 事実 · factCase SAMPLE-CASE-01 — サンプル市：路線減便後の高齢者の移動アクセス（合成データ） (state FOUNDER_REVIEW, version 1)

   evidence SAMPLE-E01, SAMPLE-E02, SAMPLE-E03, SAMPLE-E04sourcesourcesourceobserved 2026-05-02

2. 推論 · inference公開計画は運転手不足と減便を明記し、60歳以上の約4割が便数に不満と記載している（合成データ）。(the Case thesis is an inference over the evidence, not a fact)

   evidence SAMPLE-E01, SAMPLE-E02, SAMPLE-E03, SAMPLE-E04sourcesourcesourceobserved 2026-05-02

3. 推論 · inference減便後も高齢者が週2回の通院移動を維持できること — for 75歳以上の住民（合成データ）(SOURCE_CLAIM · OPEN)

   evidence SAMPLE-E01, SAMPLE-E03

制約 Constraints

どの制約が効くか · Which constraints matter?

1. 事実 · fact運行1日あたり上限コスト <= 48000 JPY(recorded on the Case)
2. 事実 · fact車椅子対応 = required(recorded on the Case)

候補ソリューションの種類 Candidate solution classes

どの種類が候補になるか · Which solution classes are candidates?

1. 推論 · inferenceSOLUTION_CLASS demand-responsive-transport — INCLUDED (confidence 0.62)

   evidence SAMPLE-E01, SAMPLE-E03

2. 仮説 · hypothesisSOLUTION_CLASS volunteer-transport — REQUIRES_VALIDATION (confidence 0.35)(requires validation before it can be relied on)

   evidence SAMPLE-E02

3. 推論 · inferenceSUPPLIER SAMPLE-SUP-A — INCLUDED (confidence 0.58)

   evidence SAMPLE-E01

4. 仮説 · hypothesisSUPPLIER SAMPLE-SUP-B — REQUIRES_VALIDATION (confidence 0.41)(requires validation before it can be relied on)

   evidence SAMPLE-E02

候補サプライヤー・製品 Candidate suppliers and products

どの候補が、どの根拠クラスで、なぜ挙がるか · Which candidates appear, on what evidence class, and why?

1. 推論 · inferenceDemand-responsive transport (solution class) — INCLUDED (confidence 0.62) · not known: operator(evidence class: SYSTEM_EXTRACTED · appears because it was evaluated against this Case's recorded constraints — presence is not endorsement)

   evidence SAMPLE-E01, SAMPLE-E03

2. 仮説 · hypothesisVolunteer transport (solution class) — REQUIRES_VALIDATION (confidence 0.35) · incompatibilities: insurance · not known: insurance, driver pool(evidence class: SYSTEM_EXTRACTED · appears because it was evaluated against this Case's recorded constraints — presence is not endorsement)

   evidence SAMPLE-E02

3. 推論 · inferenceSample Mobility Works Co. (SYNTHETIC SAMPLE) (JP) — INCLUDED (confidence 0.58) · not known: service network(evidence class: SUPPLIER_SELF_REPORTED · appears because it was evaluated against this Case's recorded constraints — presence is not endorsement)

   evidence SAMPLE-E01

4. 仮説 · hypothesisSample Assistive Devices GmbH (SYNTHETIC SAMPLE) (DE) — REQUIRES_VALIDATION (confidence 0.41) · incompatibilities: daily_cost_cap · not known: JP distributor, TAIS status(evidence class: INDEPENDENTLY_VERIFIED · appears because it was evaluated against this Case's recorded constraints — presence is not endorsement)

   evidence SAMPLE-E02

矛盾の開示 Conflict disclosure

どこで情報源が食い違うか · Where do sources conflict?

1. 事実 · factservice change: "2026年4月に市内2路線が減便された（合成データ）"(1 passage · OFFICIAL)

   evidence SAMPLE-E01sourceobserved 2026-05-01

2. 事実 · factpopulation: "75歳以上の住民は約1,200人（合成データ）"(1 passage · OFFICIAL)

   evidence SAMPLE-E02sourceobserved 2026-05-02

3. 事実 · factsatisfaction: "60歳以上の約4割が便数に不満と回答（合成データ）"(1 passage · OFFICIAL)

   evidence SAMPLE-E03sourceobserved 2026-04-20

4. 事実 · factbudget: "地域公共交通関連予算は前年度比横ばい（合成データ）"(1 passage · OFFICIAL)

   evidence SAMPLE-E04sourceobserved 2026-03-30

分かっていないこと Unknowns

何が不完全か · What evidence is incomplete?

1. 不明 · unknownMissing evidence class: FUNDING_PATHWAY(named by the qualification engine)
2. 不明 · unknownMissing evidence class: OPERATOR_CAPACITY(named by the qualification engine)
3. 推奨 · recommendationBounded research task FUNDING_PATHWAY: sample city DRT subsidy programme (OPEN)(public-source only; nobody is contacted)

次に検証すべきこと Next validation

次に何を検証すべきか · What should be validated next?

1. 不明 · unknownMissing evidence class: FUNDING_PATHWAY(named by the qualification engine)
2. 不明 · unknownMissing evidence class: OPERATOR_CAPACITY(named by the qualification engine)
3. 推奨 · recommendationBounded research task FUNDING_PATHWAY: sample city DRT subsidy programme (OPEN)(public-source only; nobody is contacted)

次の安全な一手 Next safe action

外部行動なしに進められる次の一手は何か · What is the next action that commits nothing externally?

INCOMPLETE — this section is written by the reviewer before release; the compiler does not invent recommendations